A year and a half ago, Margaret Page, a 60 year old woman who suffered a maven haemorrhage 20 years ago, starved herself to death in a capital of New Zealand resthome. She had an active life doing sport activities before she suffered a brain haemorrhage while kayaking in 1992. After that her speech and act was limited and her condition slowly deteriorated. This carapace has raised the issues here(predicate) in New Zealand close to euthanasia. All aspects of the society had cushy out their stand. She and her family became a public spectacle and this added pressure to them. Although the family supported her decision, her economize still wants to prolong her life.
One of the ethical issues that were debated upon in this case is forcing Margaret to eat against her will is a ground for criminal lash out and not forcing her is assisting her to commit suicid.

One of the guiding laws in healthcare her in New Zealand, is the Code of Health and Disability Consumers Rights. Among the safes declared in the code are: the right to be case-hardened with dignity and independence; right to services of an appropriate tired and right to be fully sure and make informed choice and give informed consent which includes making choices about future healthcare procedures, using an advance directive and the right to refuse and withdraw consent to services. On the ethical side, the principles of humanity and nonmaleficence, which is prolonging her life and preventing death, and autonomy, which Margaret has the right to make her choices, are considered.
As healthcare providers, how do we deal with this ethical dilemma and make...If you want to conquer a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.