Criminal Evidence And Legal Issues Unit Ii Discussion Boeard Questions

In my opinion it is not right or uniting for a venire to give a verdict that is at variance with the law of nature in a case for some(prenominal) resolve . The tariff of juries in my opinion is to examine the virtue of genuine bear witness and under the instruction of settle to throttle up the law to such(prenominal) facts . It is my opinion that juries should give verdicts in unity with the law and not use extraneous factors such as conscience or morality or intrinsic factors in the determination of their verdict . The making of laws is the duty of the law-makers which is chosen by the electorate and the interpretation of such laws are the duty of the hazards who are versed in legal principles .

Thus , in my opinion jury nullification as a stake staff of the jury undermines the effectiveness of laws and it is a usurpation of the powers of a judge who are the constitutionally recognized interpreters of the law and the motives of the general assembly in making such lawsFurthermore , this idea behind stretch forth to the sexual perversion of justice by a slanting jury which can give a decision against the law and weight of grounds This was the case in 1954 , when an all- etiolate jury in the state of disseminated sclerosis disregarded clear evidence and acquitted two white men of killing 14-year-old Emmett public treasury . The jury was apparently loath to enforce the law of execution against white men who kill a black pip-squeak Even the courts themselves are ! not...If you ask to get a just essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper